|
WHY THE DELAY IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF
THE 2001-2002 AUGMENTATION FUNDS?
Many people are wondering why the more the $1 million dollars
earmarked for part time faculty has been delayed. The Union and
the District have been discussing this money since the fall of
2001, yet the money is still in the possession of the District
undistributed. What is the reason for the delay.
The District's "Update on 2001-02 CTA Negotiations"
of October 10, 2002, succeeded in clouding the issues surrounding
the Part Time Augmentation Funds. The $57 million designated for
part time salary augmentation was intended by the State Legislature
to be an on-going program designed to help part time faculty salaries
to a more comparable level with full time salaries.
While the District initially offered to distribute this money
as a "one time" bonus, CTA rejected this offer because
it does not conform to the intention of the legislature and it
does not provide any long term, lasting benefit for part time
faculty. Instead, CTA proposed that the finds be added to the
part time faculty salary schedule. Glendale Community College,
Mt. San Antonio College, and the Los Angeles Community College
District have added their augmentation funds to their part time
salary schedule and they have already distributed funds to their
faculty. Unfortunately, the District balked at this obvious proposal,
and the matter has been stalled since spring.
The recently approved State budget has continued the $57 million
part time augmentation funds, so the District cannot claim that
the funds are "one-time" money. When is the District
going to do the right thing, put the augmentation funds on the
part time salary schedule, distribute the long withheld money,
and begin to improve the position of its underpaid part time faculty? |